WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
37%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



ray winstone 1:10 Sun Jan 22
Trident
Fired toward Africa ended up heading to America, nicely covered up by the Tories before the debate about renewing in the HOC.

It's a good job Corbyn's finger wasn't on the red button eh......

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

Pi Alpha Nu 2:29 Tue Jan 24
Re: Trident
It doesn't matter who's in power all governments lie. Always have done and always will.

ray winstone 1:19 Tue Jan 24
Re: Trident
Will, dress it up how you want but once again this Tory government has lied and will no doubt, with the backing of the MSM, get away with it.
Cameron, Shapps, Osborne, Johnson, Hunt and now May, all fucking liars and people like you swallow it down like a good old working class Tory, suck it up.

Mike Oxsaw 12:15 Tue Jan 24
Re: Trident
You can have 100% reliability, but you HAVE to pay for it. One failure in 160 launches is an effective successful performance rate of 99.375% - not ideal (which YOU have to pay for, remember?) but pretty good for such a complex piece of technology.

Whether or not a "cover-up" was attempted or instigated is an important but different question.

overbyyer 11:53 Tue Jan 24
Re: Trident
Michael Fallon misleading the country with this statement that HMS Vengeance was successfully returned to service.

It was actually completing sea trails after a fit-out and the trial demonstrated that the crew had successfully operated the submarine through shake-down to prove all its systems were seaworthy and operational.
The fact that the Trident missile was successfully launched as part of the shake-down and subsequently certified to re-enter service does not answer the question of the missile failure once it was in the sky.

Then you get the US, as owners, developers and suppliers, confirming that it was indeed a missile failure.

Coffee 11:46 Tue Jan 24
Re: Trident
Ag!

Willtell 11:44 Tue Jan 24
Re: Trident
ray my dear commie bastard. Does America or Russia publicly discuss in their government chambers when a missile goes wrong?

This is Corbyn getting all excited for a chance to come out fighting for the UK to disarm all its nuclear weapons isn't it? Come on now be honest.

Coffee 11:36 Tue Jan 24
Re: Trident
"my dear Tory"

Ha ha!

Used to be known as "guv"

ray winstone 11:32 Tue Jan 24
Re: Trident
Will, my dear Tory, so what if it 'only went wrong once', it's the lies and cover up that sicken me, if it wasn't 'that bad' then why lie about it?

Willtell 10:52 Tue Jan 24
Re: Trident
Most unlike anything mechanical to ever go wrong so definitely worth discussing in Parliament...

Works well for 166 tests and goes wrong once so all the lefties that want us to ban the bombs leap about like they've sat on an ants nest.

Does anyone other than leftie Ray, really give a fuck when Trump is in the Whitehouse, Muslims run amok around the world and UK is cutting the cables that keep the island attached to Europe to allow it to drift westwards....?

Mike Oxsaw 10:40 Tue Jan 24
Re: Trident
Far Cough 10:13 Tue Jan 24

...or, not whooosh, in this case. More of a whump.

Far Cough 10:13 Tue Jan 24
Re: Trident
overbyyer, whoosh

A Trident aeroplane crashed in Staines at that time

overbyyer 10:04 Tue Jan 24
Re: Trident
And if it hit Staines then it went according to plan................

overbyyer 10:01 Tue Jan 24
Re: Trident
Pi Alpha Nu wrote...

Re: Trident
I don't remember this much political fuss when one crashed near Staines in the seventies.



If it was the seventies it would have been Polaris, not Trident.

overbyyer 9:56 Tue Jan 24
Re: Trident
Sven Roeder wrote...

Re: Trident
Andrew MARR is good I think. Even after his stroke.



Not doing as well as Ken Barlow - he's made a full recovery in about 6 months.

Christmas miracle.

MikeHammer 9:45 Tue Jan 24
Re: Trident
How could they screw that up ... after all it's not bloody rocket science is it ?

Spandex Sidney 12:00 Mon Jan 23
Re: Trident
Maybe Corbyn would have better aim?

Pi Alpha Nu 11:59 Mon Jan 23
Re: Trident
I don't remember this much political fuss when one crashed near Staines in the seventies.

Mike Oxsaw 11:33 Mon Jan 23
Re: Trident
Sven Roeder 11:21 Mon Jan 23

A little effort, a little research (if it's not TOO MUCH FUCKING BOTHER) will help people assess the ability of "experts".

The Brexit Referendum & Trump election should be a great education to all "non-experts" about what constitutes being "expert" at something, but it seems most are far to keen to put (these same) "experts" right back on a pedestal again, as soon as possible (if only to throw stones at).

If you'd rather spend your time on important things like voting on BGT and ridiculing those on Jeremy Kyle that's nobody else's problem but yours - don't try and make it otherwise.

Sven Roeder 11:30 Mon Jan 23
Re: Trident
Andrew MARR is good I think. Even after his stroke.
Gets the tone right for a Sunday morning show and is one of my favourite bbc people.
Asked the question 4 times and then said you aren't going to answer the question so I will move on.
Makes the point rather than go full Paxman and ask 13 times in a row.

May just looked a bit rabbit in the headlights as she knows there is no acceptable answer to the question.

The Kronic 11:27 Mon Jan 23
Re: Trident
Vexed 9:16

Fuck me, Vexed actually posted something that made me both laugh and nod in agreement.

The Kronic 11:24 Mon Jan 23
Re: Trident
How about putting up on social media the names addresses, workplaces, habits and hobbies of all the people that have served for Queen and country all over the world? Is THAT in the public interest? Why so? Surly that they did so at OUR behest makes that overwhelmingly "public interest"?


Behave, you over-dramatic drama queen.

And yeah Sven, May was an utter mess in that interview. Flustered by the limp wristed Marr of all people.

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: